Which of the following would be the best reason for choosing a link-state routing
protocol when designing a network?
A. The network design is flat.
B. The administrators have a good knowledge of the protocol.
C. Router processor overhead is a concern.
D. The network is being implemented as a hub-and-spoke design.
E. The convergence times are not a concern.
Answer: B[/b], regarding Testking, but IS-IS is not good known.
Maybe E[/b]. but I am not sure.
What do you think?
More Information:
- connection, loginname, query, advise, provider, server, message, Msg, Level, State, Line, closed, host, failed, user, Reason, SQL
- In networks with Distance vector routing protocols flapping routes can trigger routing updates with every state change
- These and maybe other reasons caused Link State Routing to become the new dynamic routing algorithm of the ARPANET in 1979
- html - CachedLink-state routing protocol - Failure modesA Link-state routing protocol is one of the two main classes of routing
- pdf[PDF] Group Leader Election Under Link-state Routing - Network Protocols
- In a network where a Link-state routing protocol is run, route flapping will force frequent recalculation of the topology by all participating routers
- gz[PDF] Lowering Security Overhead in Link State Routing* Ralf Hauser
- If the administrative state is up and the operational state is down, the reason code differs based on the nonoperational reason code as described
More:


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

























































Bookmarks